"If skull expansion causes hair loss, how do you explain the success of hair loss surgery?"
That's a question I get asked occasionally by some people who are not yet convinced about skull expansion (skull bone growth) causing hair loss.
The point they make is that follicles from the back of the head
(occipital region - see photo) transplanted to the male pattern baldness (MPB)
region can successfully grow hair.
But, if the weaker follicles of the MPB region are transplanted to some other part of the body (i.e., where skull expansion obviously doesn't apply) the follicles still don’t rejuvenate and start growing hair again.
So how does skull expansion explain that?
My answers to these questions address not only skull expansion, but
also explains why some forms of hair loss surgery can be more successful
Most patients who get a transplant already have severe hair loss, which means that skull expansion has probably fully developed* in that region of the scalp. So further bone growth following the procedure is unlikely.
* Note: Obviously the skull doesn't keep growing indefinitely! It does eventually stop. The extent to which the skull bones grow all depends upon skull shape. And skull shape also explains why some people go completely bald whilst others lose hair in just one region (e.g., a receding hairline) or to a lesser extent (thinning hair).
So, if either the existing MPB region follicles can be rejuvenated, or healthy donor follicles (follicular units) can be successfully transplanted into the MPB area, there's a good chance that normal healthy hair can be produced.
However, hair loss surgery is a complicated process - there's a lot
more to it than just that...
Transplanted follicles are avascular (without blood vessels) and so, must successfully stimulate angiogenesis (new blood vessel formation) if they are to survive.
This leads on to three important factors that can explain why some types of hair loss surgery are more successful than others:
Follicles transplanted from the back of the head (occipital region) can successfully
stimulate angiogenesis because:
1. They are healthy and active,
vigorously producing hair.
2. They are normal sized, not
miniaturized. This means that, when inserted, they should be slightly
closer to the micro circulation (blood supply) beneath the follicle than
are the existing (miniaturized) follicles in the MPB region.
3. They have a small protective layer of brown adipose tissue.
Brown adipose tissue (or brown fat) is one of two main types of body fat (the other type being white adipose tissue). Brown fat accumulates around the follicles of healthy, actively growing hair (such as in the occipital region), but not around dormant follicles (as in the MPB region).
And it's been observed that hair loss surgery employing the Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) method often lacks the protective layer of fat that other transplant techniques (such as Follicular Unit Transplantation or FUT) do manage to extract from the donor site. And because of this, poor hair regrowth can result. Source: wikipedia
Also, studies have been made that link brown fat to angiogenesis (i.e., brown fat encourages new blood vessel formation). See abstract in springer.com
So, for all these reasons, it's highly likely that brown fat assists hair growth.
In the picture you can see how hair follicles penetrate deep into the fat layer, and the blood supply beneath it, in a healthy region of the scalp.
Follicles transplanted from the MPB region to some other part of the body may fail to stimulate angiogenesis because:
1. They are weaker and less active than
follicles from the occipital region.
2. They are miniaturized and so, will be
further away from the micro circulation when inserted.
3. They do not carry any supportive brown adipose tissue.
So, without angiogenesis, the transplanted hair follicles can't grow any new hair. The question concerning the transplantation of MPB follicles then, has nothing really to do with skull expansion. Rather, it's an issue with adipose tissue and angiogenesis.
Adipose tissue and angiogenesis are, of course, just two of many complex aspects to hair loss surgery. And
it's this complexity, as well as the uncertainty of success and the
extremely high cost, which ultimately means that most people will choose not to have a hair transplant.
Hair transplants can sometimes be successful in those who are quite young. That's because, since skull expansion and hair loss can start as early as puberty in some people, their skull shape might be fully developed by the time they reach their 20's or early 30's.
But it should also be mentioned that when you're very young it's difficult to know what the degree of eventual hair loss will be. That's why patients are usually advised to wait until they're older before having surgery, i.e., when the full extent of their hair loss and skull expansion is known.
Of course, the problem with waiting many years before having a transplant is that, by the time you're ready, there might not be much donor hair left to use!
This is page 3 of 3.
Read previous page? Which Is the Best Hair Transplant Technique?
Like this page?